Independent vs In-House Designers

What’s the Difference?

When planning a construction or fit-out project, you’ll generally have two options for design:

Engage an independent designer and go to tender or work with a builder who provides in-house design services.

Both approaches have their advantages, depending on your priorities.

A Key Distinction

Let’s strip away the assumption that one type of designer is better than the other—there are highly skilled professionals working in both roles. Instead, the key difference lies in who the designer is working for.

An independent designer works directly for you. Their job is to represent your interests, develop the design according to your needs, and ensure that it’s properly executed, regardless of which builder you choose.

A builder’s in-house designer works for the builder. Their primary focus is to develop a design that aligns with the builder’s preferred construction methods, materials, and cost structure.

That distinction can have a big impact on how your project unfolds.

The Case for an Independent Designer

If you engage an independent designer, they’ll develop the design, documentation, and specifications before putting the project out to tender. This means:

More control over the final product – The design is tailored to your needs from the outset, not shaped by a builder’s internal preferences.

Transparent pricing – With detailed design documentation in hand, multiple builders can provide comparable quotes, making it easier to assess value.

Flexibility in choosing a builder – You’re not locked into a single contractor from day one; you can select a builder based on price, experience, or other factors.

A dedicated advocate – Because the designer works for you, they’ll oversee the project to ensure it’s built as intended and flag any deviations.

However, this approach requires more from your designer. Tendering takes time, and if included in their scope, your designer will be responsible for coordinating responses, assessing quotes, and presenting them to you for final decisions.

The Case for a Builder’s In-House Designer

If you go with a builder’s design service, the design and construction phases are combined under one contract (often called ‘design and construct’). This means:

A potentially faster process – The builder can start planning construction while the design is being developed, reducing overall timelines.

Simplified coordination – With design and construction handled by the same team, there’s less back-and-forth between parties.

Upfront cost certainty – Because the design is developed with the builder’s pricing in mind, you get an early indication of total project costs.

The trade-off is that your choices may be more limited. The design will typically align with the builder’s preferred materials, suppliers, and methodologies, which may not always be the best fit for your vision or budget. And because you’re locked into a single contractor from the outset, you lose the competitive tension of the tender process.

Which Approach Is Right for You?

It depends on your priorities:

If you want competitive pricing, an independent design process, and control over the final product, an independent designer is the way to go.

If you want a streamlined process, fewer parties to manage, and an early cost commitment, a builder’s in-house designer could be a better fit.

Neither approach is inherently better—just different. The key is knowing what you’re signing up for and choosing the route that best aligns with your goals.

Navigate the links below for more blog posts related to design and construction, or email me if you're old school and prefer the personal touch.